Philosophical Clarity

About

The main thinker behind Philosophical Clarity is Mark Davidson.

Here’s how he tells his story …

A Philosophical Awakening

I’ve been drawn to philosophy since my mid-teens. But, despite all the books I read, all the classes I took at university, and all the conversations I had with friends, philosophy didn’t truly come alive to me until, at the age of twenty-six, I had a sudden philosophical awakening.

I was taking a post-grad course in outdoor education and I’d been revisiting the philosophers and psychologists who’d influenced me. Outdoor education, for me, was a tool for personal development and I wanted to have a clear sense of what personal development really meant.

One evening during the Christmas holidays, I sat down in a friend’s cottage with some books by Nietzsche. The wood-burning stove made the room warm and snug, and my friend was busy making twine out of nettles that he’d collected earlier in the year.

We’d spent the day running steep rivers in our kayaks, so perhaps dealing with danger all day long had made it easy for me to contemplate the nature of life and of death. Perhaps the fatigue in my muscles made it easy for my mind to focus. Perhaps I’d just reached a new level of maturity. One way or another, certainly, Nietzsche’s thinking hit home in a way it never had before. I read page after page, absorbing his thinking, and then saw in a flash that he was right — and not just right in the trivial sense of his reasoning being correct. I saw that his whole way of looking at things was valid. He’d been using his high rhetorical style to reveal flaws in the whole project of western philosophy, and I suddenly saw that those flaws were real. There genuinely was no bedrock underpinning the moral philosophies that Nietzsche was attacking. The philosophical systems were shaped by historical forces and personal stories of the philosophers, not by underlying truths. There were no solid foundations, not in logic, nor in a scientific understanding of the world.

I then aimed Nietzsche’s methods at my own ethical beliefs and, at that point, everything in my life changed. My beliefs fell apart. Yet being an ethical person was a core part of my identity. I was a vegetarian for ethical reasons. I’d stood for election for the Green Party. I’d even chosen to work in outdoor education because I saw it as an ethical career path. But was it? For my choices to be justifiable, I had to assume that some possibilities were better than others in some fundamental sense. But what could those fundamentals be? I didn’t know. I felt exposed. Excited. Intimidated. The ground had disappeared from beneath me.

So I set out on a philosophical quest, determined to find an intellectually solid foundation upon which to build the rest of my life.

Two Starting Points

I began my philosophical quest by going back to the thinkers I’d studied, from the Ancient Greeks to contemporary philosophers who were still carving out their academic careers, but I was saddened and disappointed. All the great theories fell before Nietzsche’s critiques, or other critiques that I came up with myself. I realised that I would need to develop a philosophical approach of my own.

I had a full decade of hopeful beginnings and dead ends. But at last I found two good starting points – two visions of philosophy that I was happy to stand behind.

The first came from the Oxford philosopher, Alfred Ayer, who wrote that, “What uniquely concerns the philosopher is that he is concerned with reality as a whole. [What is required of the philosopher] is not that he should merely assemble the scientific theories of his time but that he should integrate them into a world picture”.1 I realised philosophy is able to do something that the sciences can’t. It can take the fragmented pictures of reality that other disciplines provide and use them to build a coherent synthesis.

The second starting point came from Ludwig Wittgenstein, who saw philosophy as a quest for “complete clarity” where all philosophical problems “completely disappear.”2

What I had to do, then, was develop a philosophical synthesis that was powerful enough to take in all the problems of Western philosophy, including what I now understood as ‘the problem of ethics’ — a synthesis that would give me a view of my life, and of the human condition in general, that dissolved all sense of the philosophically problematic. Everything would become clear. Life would just be what it was, and it would be fine.

Working As A Coach

Alongside my work in philosophy, I had a career in education. I ran an outdoor centre for a few years. I led 23-day adventure-based personal development programmes in the Colorado Rockies. I moved into experiential leadership development work, working with big companies and business schools, and then into coaching, which put me in a privileged position. People would share whatever it was in their professional or personal lives that they were most struggling with or grappling with. I could then help them discover solutions or helpful strategies.

Time and again, I found that there were structural similarities in the difficulties that people faced, no matter what their background was, or what area of life they were trying to get to grips with. I realised that this was because there was a certain geometry to life’s challenges. Different aspects of the geometry would come to the fore for different people at different times, but the geometry itself was consistent.

My coaching work put another constraint on the body of thinking that I was developing. It had to reflect the underlying geometry of life that was revealed by my coachees’ everyday experiences.

I also came to hope that my philosophical synthesis would gain a practical application through providing solid conceptual foundations for the world of coaching. I loved the impact good coaching could have, but I hated all the waffle and nonsense that coaches and coach training organisations came out with. Coaching was fundamentally about helping people live well, I thought to myself. So surely some clarity about what living well really means in practice would help.

Casting My Net Wide

I found that many disciplines could help inform the emerging synthesis.

The arts often embody an understanding of the human condition. There was a lot to be learnt from storytellers and poets.

I started practising capoeira angola, an art form with roots in West Africa, and found that it embodied a reality-centred approach to living well that was a perfect counterbalance to the idea-centred approaches of European philosophy. Capoeira games function as a microcosm of the world at large, for life, I realised, is fundamentally game-like. We pursue goals that are intrinsic to the activities we engage in, and we can only attain the goals we strive for by taking on the specific forms that players of the particular game have found to be effective. Game thinking helped me connect molecular biology, thermodynamics, information theory, and evolution theory. It also helped me understand Wittgenstein’s thinking, for a large portion of the book he spent the last decades of his life working on was taken up by an account of the game-like nature of language.

I found Buddhist thinking valuable too. I’d learnt to meditate when I was 19 and, following my Gran’s suggestion, I spent a week at a spiritual community in the north of Scotland called the Findhorn Foundation. That week gave me a sense for the vastness of human potential, and it showed me that meditation could be a valuable discipline. Now I found my meditation practice to be crucial for the synthesis, for it helped me see how the ideas in my own head functioned. I have a succession of mental events that, from within, feel like a direct apprehension of reality. But they are only mental events. Reality itself is an ungraspable stream of being that the best of my mental events can help me navigate.

Clarity Found

It took a long time for the philosophical synthesis to take shape. I made lots of missteps. I had many false starts. When I tried to express my thinking, what I came up with, over and over, was at once incomplete and overly complicated.

All I could do was continue on, working on the philosophy, then the approach to coaching, then the philosophy some more, iteration after iteration, till I had an expression of the philosophy that made it obvious that all the problems of Western philosophy are merely pseudo-problems. Even the ‘problem of ethics’ finally dissolved. And the perspectives that made this possible also made it clear what exactly coaching should be doing and how coaching should best be practiced.

My hope now is that the philosophical clarity I have worked so hard to build can help others whose inquiring minds are vexed by philosophical problems. And I hope that my thinking can help the world of coaching escape all the waffle and mediocrity and at last fulfil its potential to help people live well.

These are challenging times. I believe that philosophical clarity and widespread good coaching can help us, as a global community, meet those challenges well.

 

Mark Davidson
Edinburgh
September 2025

Applied Philosophy

Philosophical Clarity provides the solid conceptual foundations for a next-generation range of coaching products:

  • Coaching from coaches who help coachees use their own capacity for insight to work out how they live better in both their working and their personal lives.
  • Self-coaching tools that enable people to work out how to live better on their own.
  • Coach training courses for people who want to learn a bullshit-free approach to coaching.

  1. A J Ayer, The Nature Of Philosophical Enquiry, in The Meaning Of Life And Other Essays, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990, p. 65.
  2. “The clarity that we are aiming at is indeed complete clarity. But this simply means that the philosophical problems should completely disappear. The real discovery is the one that makes me capable of stopping doing philosophy when I want to. –The one that gives philosophy peace, so that it is no longer tormented by questions which bring itself in question.” Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, §133.